Fry v. Spatz

29 Pa. Super. 592, 1905 Pa. Super. LEXIS 385
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 10, 1905
DocketAppeal, No. 171
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 29 Pa. Super. 592 (Fry v. Spatz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fry v. Spatz, 29 Pa. Super. 592, 1905 Pa. Super. LEXIS 385 (Pa. Ct. App. 1905).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from the judgment of the common pleas affirming the judgment of a justice of the peace, which was brought before that court by certiorari. The record shows that the cause of action was within the jurisdiction conferred upon justices of the peace by the act of 1810, and th'e return of the constable shows on its face a valid service of the summons upon the defendant. By the express terms of the 22d section of the act of 1810, the judgment of the common pleas in such a case, when brought before it bjr certiorari, is final. So far as the right to appeal to this court is concerned, the case is not distinguishable from Phœnix Iron Works Company v. Mullen, 25 Pa. Superior Ct. 547, in which the authorities bearing upon the question are collected.

The appeal is quashed at the appellant’s cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bell Appeal
152 A.2d 731 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1959)
Sweitzer v. Emert
55 Pa. Super. 176 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 Pa. Super. 592, 1905 Pa. Super. LEXIS 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fry-v-spatz-pasuperct-1905.