Fritz v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fritz v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc.

306 A.D.2d 895, 760 N.Y.S.2d 924

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 13, 2003

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

This text of 306 A.D.2d 895 (Fritz v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fritz v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., 306 A.D.2d 895, 760 N.Y.S.2d 924 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Oneida County (Siegel, J.), entered June 5, 2002, which denied defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict and, alternatively, for a new trial.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens, 155 AD2d 435 [1989]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1], [2]). Present — Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Gorski and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Oneida County (Siegel, J.), entered June 5, 2002, which denied defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict and, alternatively, for a new trial.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens, 155 AD2d 435 [1989]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1], [2]). Present — Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Gorski and Hayes, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

306 A.D.2d 895, 760 N.Y.S.2d 924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fritz-v-white-consolidated-industries-inc-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack