Friends of the River v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
FRIENDS OF THE RIVER,
Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 16-2327 (JMC)
v.
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Court orders the
following:
All claims against Lieutenant General Todd T. Semonite, sued in his official capacity, are
DISMISSED. Accordingly, Lt. Gen. Semonite is DISMISSED from the case.
Next, the Court PARTIALLY GRANTS and PARTIALLY DENIES Defendant’s
Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF 79. The Court grants the motion as to all materials that
Defendant withheld under the attorney-client and/or work-product privileges, and as to some
materials that were withheld under the deliberative process privilege due to their potential to cause
“public confusion.” Those records are the following: SPDF01000095, SPDF01000096,
SPDF01087483–7484, SPDF01098644–8646, SPDF01108669–8859, SPDF01108860–8862,
SPDF01112798–2812, SPDF01113024–3031, SPDF03001614–1619, SPDF03005625–5709,
SPDF03006282–6310, SPDF03007414–7415, SPDF03007586–7615, SPDF03009080–9082,
SPDF03009443, SPDF03009444, and R_SPDF01000001–0008. The Court denies Defendant’s
motion as to all other withheld materials.
1 Finally, the Court PARTIALLY GRANTS and PARTIALLY DENIES Plaintiff’s Cross-
Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF 80. The Court orders Defendant to release all responsive
materials that were withheld solely pursuant to the deliberative process privilege, with the
exception of the specific records identified in the previous paragraph.
SO ORDERED.
DATE: June 21, 2023
Jia M. Cobb U.S. District Court Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Friends of the River v. United States Army Corps of Engineers (Friends of the River v. United States Army Corps of Engineers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.