Friends of the Cowlitz and Cpr-Fish, City of Tacoma, Intervenor v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Ninth Circuit

Friends of the Cowlitz and Cpr-Fish, City of Tacoma, Intervenor v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

282 F.3d 609, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1822, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 2215, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 3032

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2002·No. 99-70373·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The opinion reported at 253 F.3d 1161 is amended as follows:

On page 1162, line 9 of text in column one, delete “River” so that name of petitioner is corrected to “Friends of the Cowlitz”.

On page 1163, line 23 of text in column two, make the same change.

On page 1162, lines 1-4, column two, change to read: “The upstream Mossyrock Dam (185 Ft., completed in 1963), and the downstream Mayfield Dam (325 ft., completed in 1968).”

The petition for rehearing is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The opinion reported at 253 F.3d 1161 is amended as follows:

On page 1162, line 9 of text in column one, delete “River” so that name of petitioner is corrected to “Friends of the Cowlitz”.

On page 1163, line 23 of text in column two, make the same change.

On page 1162, lines 1-4, column two, change to read: “The upstream Mossyrock Dam (185 Ft., completed in 1963), and the downstream Mayfield Dam (325 ft., completed in 1968).”

The petition for rehearing is denied.

Friends of the Cowlitz and Cpr-Fish, City of Tacoma, Intervenor v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 282 F.3d 609, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1822, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 2215, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 3032 (9th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

282 F.3d 609 (Friends of the Cowlitz and Cpr-Fish, City of Tacoma, Intervenor v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Northern California Power Agency Williams Power Company Inc. Powerex Corporation Reliant Energy Power Generation, Inc. Duke Energy North America, Llc, Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, Llc, (Collectively, "Duke Energy") California Electricty Oversight Board Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc., El Segundo Power Llc, Long Beach Generation Llc, Cabrillo Power I Llc, and Cabrillo Power II LLC (Collectively, "Dynegy") M-S-R Public Power Agency the Modesto Irrigation District City of Santa Clara, California the Modesto Irrigation District City of Redding, California Avista Energy Inc. Puget Sound Energy, Inc., Intervenors v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, California Independent System Operator Corporation, Intervenor. California Independent System Operator Corporation, Duke Energy North America, Llc, Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, Llc, (Collectively, "Duke Energy"), Intervenor v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

464 F.3d 861 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)

Pacific Gas & Electric Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

464 F.3d 861 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)

Cowlitz Indian Tribe v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

186 F. App'x 806 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)

United States v. Southern California Edison Co.

300 F. Supp. 2d 964 (E.D. California, 2004)

Opinion

Related