Friedman v. Warden

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6324

ANDREW FRIEDMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN; JOHN P. GALLEY, Commissioner; WAYNE WEBB, Assistant Warden; KENNETH HORNING, Warden; SERGEANT HINKLE; OFFICER YOUNKER; OFFICER RICHIE; OFFICER HENRY; JON WHITEMAN, Lieutenant; CHAPLAIN ISHMAEL; OFFICER DUNN; OFFICER GELESPI,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:10-cv-00248-DKC)

Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 4, 2011

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrew Friedman, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Andrew Friedman appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Friedman v. Warden, No. 8:10-cv-00248-DKC (D. Md. Feb.

28, 2011). We deny Friedman’s motion to appoint counsel. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED