Friedman v. Warden

427 F. App'x 261

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Andrew Friedman appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Friedman v. Warden, No. 8:10-cv-00248-DKC, 2011 WL 768842 (D.Md. Feb. 28, 2011). We deny Friedman’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.