Friedman v. State

New York Court of Appeals

Friedman v. State

252 N.E.2d 131, 25 N.Y.2d 905, 304 N.Y.S.2d 597, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1075

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 25, 1969

DocketClaim 44913

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 252 N.E.2d 131 (Friedman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Friedman v. State, 252 N.E.2d 131, 25 N.Y.2d 905, 304 N.Y.S.2d 597, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1075 (N.Y. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will he amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether the rights of claimant under the First, Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments were denied. The Court of Appeals held that there was no denial of claimant’s constitutional rights. (See 24 N Y 2d 528.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will he amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether the rights of claimant under the First, Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments were denied. The Court of Appeals held that there was no denial of claimant’s constitutional rights. (See 24 N Y 2d 528.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 N.E.2d 131, 25 N.Y.2d 905, 304 N.Y.S.2d 597, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-state-ny-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack