Friedman v. State

New York Court of Appeals

Friedman v. State

252 N.E.2d 131, 25 N.Y.2d 905, 304 N.Y.S.2d 597, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1075

New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 25, 1969·No. Claim 44913·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will he amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether the rights of claimant under the First, Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments were denied. The Court of Appeals held that there was no denial of claimant’s constitutional rights. (See 24 N Y 2d 528.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will he amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether the rights of claimant under the First, Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments were denied. The Court of Appeals held that there was no denial of claimant’s constitutional rights. (See 24 N Y 2d 528.)

Friedman v. State, 252 N.E.2d 131, 25 N.Y.2d 905, 304 N.Y.S.2d 597, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1075 (N.Y. 1969).

Pincite

252 N.E.2d 131 (Friedman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related