Friedman v. Halpern
This text of 271 A.D.2d 804 (Friedman v. Halpern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action by the plaintiff for an injunction and damages arising out of the alleged violation of a restrictive covenant that terminated before the trial of the action, the complaint was dismissed by the trial court upon the merits, and from the judgment entered thereon, the plaintiff appeals. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Aldrich, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
271 A.D.2d 804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-halpern-nyappdiv-1946.