Friedman v. Halpern
269 A.D. 983, 58 N.Y.S.2d 341, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4908
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 5, 1945·No. Appeal No. 1·Published
Opinion
[984]*984In an action to restrain the violation of a covenant against engaging in certain business in a specified area, plaintiff appeals, from an order denying his motion to preclude defendants because of their alleged failure to comply with a prior order directing the service of a bill of particulars. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Lewis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Friedman v. Halpern, 269 A.D. 983, 58 N.Y.S.2d 341, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4908 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).
269 A.D. 983 (Friedman v. Halpern) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.