Friedman v. Halpern
This text of 269 A.D. 983 (Friedman v. Halpern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[984]*984In an action to restrain the violation of a covenant against engaging in certain business in a specified area, plaintiff appeals, from an order denying his motion to preclude defendants because of their alleged failure to comply with a prior order directing the service of a bill of particulars. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Lewis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 A.D. 983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/friedman-v-halpern-nyappdiv-1945.