Friedman v. Bartell
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ROBERT JOSEPH FRIEDMAN, Plaintiff, -against- 22-CV-7630 (CS) DR. ABRAHAM BARTELL; UNITED JEWISH ORDER OF SERVICE FEDERATION OF NEW YORK; HARVEY BACHMAN, Defendants. CATHY SEIBEL, United States District Judge: By Order dated June 5, 2023, (ECF No. 22), which I incorporate by reference herein, I ordered that the Clerk of Court send a copy of the summons and the amended complaint to Defendant Harvey Bachman by international mail. Plaintiff has now advised that the address previously provided is incorrect. (ECF No. 30.) Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to send a copy of the summons and amended complaint to Defendant Harvey Bachman at Nachal Dolev Street 55, Bet Shemesh, Israel, by international mail. The Court further directs the Clerk of Court to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: October 20, 2023 New York, New York +
United Stafes District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Friedman v. Bartell (Friedman v. Bartell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.