Friedeberg v. Share Info Consultant Service LLC
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DONNALFRIEDEBERG, ———SOSOS~S~S
Plaintiff, -against- 25 CIVIL 3999 (LLS) JUDGMENT US SHARE INFO CONSULTANT SERVICE LLC, Defendant. wee K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated June 25, 2025, the Court has dismissed this action as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). If Plaintiff continues to abuse the privilege of proceeding IFP, the Court may order her to show cause why she should not be barred from proceeding IFP in this Court without prior permission. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); Judgment is entered dismissing this action. Dated: New York, New York June 27, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerkof Court BY: HK MANGO Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Friedeberg v. Share Info Consultant Service LLC (Friedeberg v. Share Info Consultant Service LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.