Fried v. . New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Co.
130 N.E. 917, 230 N.Y. 619, 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 897
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hogan, Caedozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Ceane and Andbews, JJ. Not sitting: His cock, Ch. J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fried v. . New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Co., 130 N.E. 917, 230 N.Y. 619, 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 897 (N.Y. 1921).
130 N.E. 917 (Fried v. . New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Weigl v. Quincy Specialties Co.
190 Misc. 2d 1 (New York Supreme Court, 2001)
Ashley v. New York City Transit Authority
129 Misc. 2d 1 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Senko v. Fonda
53 A.D.2d 638 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Miner v. Long Island Lighting Co.
47 A.D.2d 842 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
Conkey v. New York Central Railroad
206 Misc. 1077 (New York Supreme Court, 1954)
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Cochran
277 A.D.2d 625 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
Warfield Natural Gas Co. v. Wright
54 S.W.2d 666 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1932)