Friction Division Products, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company, Incorporated

883 F.2d 1027, 12 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1575, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 10664, 1989 WL 80668

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
• Decided: July 24, 1989
• Docket: 89-1187
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

883 F.2d 1027

12 U.S.P.Q.2d 1575

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
FRICTION DIVISION PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
E.I. du PONT de NEMOURS & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 89-1187.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 24, 1989.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, BENNETT, Senior Circuit Judge, and NIES, Circuit Judge.

MARKEY, Chief Judge.

DECISION

Friction Division Products, Inc. appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, 658 F.Supp. 998, 3 USPQ2d 1775, and 693 F.Supp. 114, 8 USPQ2d 1652, holding United States Patent No. 4,374,211 invalid. We affirm.

OPINION

We affirm on the basis of the district court's opinions. The references to the Third Circuit's "substantial representation of the invention" standard, 658 F.Supp. at 1008, 3 USPQ2d at 1782 and 693 F.Supp. at 121-22, 8 USPQ2d at 1658, were harmless error because the court also applied a correct legal standard of anticipation in its first opinion, 658 F.Supp. at 1009-10, 3 USPQ2d at 1782-83, because some of the claims were held not anticipated, and because the court correctly determined that the latter claims were invalid under 35 U.S.C. Sec. 103 (1982) in its second opinion, 693 F.Supp. at 127-32, 8 USPQ2d at 1663-68. See Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip Corp., 713 F.2d 1530, 1540, 218 USPQ 871, 880 (Fed.Cir.1983).