French Kreme Co. v. United States

16 Ct. Cust. 126, 1928 WL 28018, 1928 CCPA LEXIS 50
CourtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals
DecidedMay 7, 1928
DocketNo. 3034
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 16 Ct. Cust. 126 (French Kreme Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Customs and Patent Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
French Kreme Co. v. United States, 16 Ct. Cust. 126, 1928 WL 28018, 1928 CCPA LEXIS 50 (ccpa 1928).

Opinion

Hatfield, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

Merchandise, consisting of egg yolk in the form of powder and described in the several invoices as “Spray Hen Yolk,” “Dried Spray Egg Yolk,” “Dried Hen Egg Yolk,” and “Hen Egg Yolk-Spray,” was assessed for duty by the collector at the port of New York at 18 cents per pound under paragraph 713 of the Tariff Act of 1922 as “dried egg yolk.”

Paragraph 713'reads as follows:

Pab. 713. Eggs of poultry, in the shell, 8 cents per dozen; whole eggs, egg yolk, and egg albumen, frozen or otherwise prepared or preserved, and not specially provided for, 6 cents per pound; dried whole eggs, dried egg yolk, and dried egg albumen, 18 cents per pound.

It was claimed by the importers in the protests that the merchandise was dutiable at only 6 cents per pound under paragraph 713, as “Egg yolk * * * prepared or preserved, and not specially provided for.”

[127]*127It appears from the testimony of the witness, Fletcher, who testified for the importer, that the involved egg yolk, represented by Exhibit A, has been subjected to the following processes:

* * * The eggs are broken, separated, passed through a screen ill order to' break the skin, until you have a small mass, then poured under pressure and forced through pipes through the top of a chamber which would be approximately 18 to 20 feet wide and 30 to 40 feet tall. The eggs come through a nozzle or spray at the top of this chamber and are dropped out to the center of the chamber in a fine mass. In dropping through this chamber they pass through a 4-foot wave of warm air which has a tendency to dry out a certain amount of the moisture; but it does not in any way affect the fats of the egg, leaves the egg uncooked, uncoagu-lated. There is a certain process that they use before they put these eggs through the screen which was a secret German proposition. I never was initiated into the details of that although I have be.en through the mechanical work of many plants, the largest of which was Putty Foo.
The temperature in that chamber is about 180° and in some cases it may run up to 200°. The reason why the material is not affected-by the slightest coagulating is the same as when you drop a drop of water on a hot stove. ' You see the drop runs all over the top of the stove, and in the inside of that drop, according to chemists, it is stone cold. When this egg [meaning the small particles of the egg yolk] gets heated the egg itself takes a globular shape and the moisture inside is all cold. This evaporation process takes place and the removal of this moisture the egg itself [the witness is referring to the small particles of egg yolk] becomes o Id and only evaporates the outside by the time it passes through this Jy-foot heated area. ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡ ‡
Q. Is the egg subjected to any heat before it gets to the nozzle? — A. No, sir.
Q. The heat is in the chamber after it passes out of the nozzle? — A. Yes, sir; it is not continuous; there is no contact with heat.
Q. Just while it is passing through? — A. Yes, sir.
Q. It is under pressure when it comes out of the nozzle? — A. It comes out either by hot air or steam that breaks it up.
Q. When it comes out of the nozzle is it in particles the same as the illustrative Exhibit A? — A. Well, it would be in particles the same as the Exhibit A if these particles had the water with them; it still has moisture with the egg when it leaves the nozzle.
Q. It passes through the blanket or layer of hot air.? — A. Yes, sir.
Q. And falls into some receptacle? — A. They fall down a conical shaped drain out through the bottom.
Q. When they drain out are they this commodity? — A. Yes, sir. (Italics ours.)

The witness also described the various methods of preparing “granular” or “native” egg yolk, which is represented in the record by Exhibit B and conceded by the importers to be dried egg yolk. He said:

The Witness. Yes, sir; this illustrative Exhibit B is .manufactured — the natives manufacture it in a very primitive way, they put the eggs in a pan, bake it in the pan until they get a dry mass and then grind it up between stones.
Justice Waite. That is the way it is made, dried and ground?
The Witness. Yes, sir.
By Mr. Wilson:
Q. You are speaking of the egg yolk now? — A. Yes.
[128]*128. Q. Mr. Fletcher, are not there other methods of producing the Exhibit B except baking in the pan? — A. Yes, it is also dried on a heated surface; in a commercial way they dry it in drums, where they spill it on one side of a heated drum and scrape it off with a knife and then grind it.
Q. Ground afterwards? — A. Yes, sir.

It appears from tbe record that the processing to which the imported merchandise, Exhibit A, has been subjected has removed all but from 3 to 6 per cent of moisture. It is readily soluble in water. It is known in the trade, according to the witness for importers, as “spray egg yolk,” “soluble egg yolk,” and “processed sprayed egg yolk” and is sold to the baking, mayonnaise, and ice cream industries. The same witnesses stated that “granular” or “native” egg yolk, Exhibit B, due to the cooking process to which it is subjected, contains only from 2.5 to 3 per centum of moisture, is not soluble in water, and can not be used for the making of ice cream, mayonnaise, or sponge cake, but can be used only for the making of noodles and “flat cakes, cookies, when there is no spring, or springy properties of the cake desired. In other words, it is used as egg flavor in those cakes ”; that it is known in the trade as “granular egg yolk,” “native egg yolk,” and “dried egg yolk”; and that Exhibit A is a better product, adaptable to more uses, and sells in the market for about twice as much as the merchandise represented by Exhibit B. Some of the importers’ witnesses were interrogated concerning commercial designation. The following testimony of the witness Clarence M. Pitt is illustrative of the method employed by counsel for importers to prove commercial designation:

Q. Was the expression dried egg yolk used in the wholesale trade and commerce in the United States on and before September 21, 1922? — -A. It was.
Q. How long had you known it to be so used? — A. For 16 years.
Q. Prior to September, 1922? — A. Sixteen years altogether.
Q. In the course of your business did you become familiar with the expression dried egg yolk as that expression was used and understood in the wholesale trade and commerce of the United States on or before September 21, 1922?— A. I did.
Q. When so used was the expression dried egg yolk used in only a part of the United States or throughout the whole of the United States? — -A. Throughout the whole of the United States.
Q. When so used has the expression dried egg yolk had the same meaning everywhere in the United States? — A. It did.
Q.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. A. Sahadi & Co.
23 C.C.P.A. 293 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1936)
Harper v. United States
23 C.C.P.A. 177 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1935)
United States v. Moss
22 C.C.P.A. 249 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1934)
United States v. John B. Stetson Co.
21 C.C.P.A. 3 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1933)
French Kreme Co. v. United States
18 C.C.P.A. 301 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Ct. Cust. 126, 1928 WL 28018, 1928 CCPA LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/french-kreme-co-v-united-states-ccpa-1928.