Freeman v. State
This text of 11 S.W.3d 240 (Freeman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
The opinion of the Court was delivered
A jury convicted Appellant of delivery of a controlled substance and assessed punishment at confinement for life. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Freeman v. State, 998 S.W.2d 379 (Tex.App.—Texarkana 1999). We granted Appellant’s petition for discretionary review to address the Court of Appeals’ disposition of Appellant’s Brady1 and entrapment claims.
Appellant has died. His counsel has filed a motion to abate appeal and forwarded a certified copy of the death certificate. The death of an appellant during the pen-dency of his appeal deprives this Court and the Court of Appeals of jurisdiction. Ryan v. State, 891 S.W.2d 275 (Tex.Crim.App.1994). Tex.R.App.Pro. 7.1(a)(2). Accordingly, the motion to abate appeal is granted and the petition for discretionary review is dismissed. The Texarkana Court of Appeals is directed to permanently abate the appeal of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 S.W.3d 240, 2000 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 16, 2000 WL 141178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-state-texcrimapp-2000.