Emilio Cortez Sandoval, Jr. v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 3, 2003
Docket07-03-00137-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Emilio Cortez Sandoval, Jr. v. State (Emilio Cortez Sandoval, Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Emilio Cortez Sandoval, Jr. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

NO. 07-03-0137-CR


IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


AT AMARILLO


PANEL A


DECEMBER 3, 2003



______________________________


EMILIO CORTEZ SANDOVAL, JR., APPELLANT


V.


THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE


_________________________________


FROM THE 287TH DISTRICT COURT OF BAILEY COUNTY;


NO. 2154; HONORABLE GORDON H. GREEN, JUDGE


_______________________________


Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

PERMANENT ABATEMENT

Following a plea of not guilty, appellant Emilio Cortez Sandoval, Jr. was convicted by a jury of delivery of a controlled substance, enhanced, and punishment was assessed at 15 years confinement and a $5,000 fine. Following submission of this appeal, the State filed a Suggestion of Death indicating appellant died on November 16, 2003.

An appellant's death during the pendency of his appeal deprives an appellate court of jurisdiction. See Freeman v. State, 11 S.W.3d 240 (Tex.Cr.App. 2000) citing Ryan v. State, 891 S.W.2d 275 (Tex.Cr.App. 1994). Accordingly, this appeal is permanently abated.

Don H. Reavis

Justice



Do not publish.

es/>

NO. 07-10-00445-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

DECEMBER 2, 2010

IN RE RODDY D. PIPPIN, RELATOR

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Roddy Dean Pippin, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of mandamus on October 25, 2010.  By letter of October 26, we informed relator of his failure to pay the requisite filing fee.  In a letter of November 12, we notified relator the filing fee remained unpaid and explained the proceeding would be dismissed unless the filing fee was paid or an affidavit of indigence filed by November 23.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 20.1, 42.3(c).  Relator did not pay the fee or file an affidavit of indigence as directed. 

Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 42.3(c).

Per Curiam


Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ryan v. State
891 S.W.2d 275 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1994)
Freeman v. State
11 S.W.3d 240 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Emilio Cortez Sandoval, Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emilio-cortez-sandoval-jr-v-state-texapp-2003.