Freeman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Freeman v. State

852 S.W.2d 431, 1993 WL 158441

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 18, 1993·No. No. 62507·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the dismissal, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears; an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the dismissal, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears; an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Freeman v. State, 852 S.W.2d 431, 1993 WL 158441 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

852 S.W.2d 431 (Freeman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.