Freeman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Freeman v. State

817 S.W.2d 553, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1246, 1991 WL 153006

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Freeman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 34 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 13, 1991·No. No. 59206·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the allegations in his motion, the transcript of his plea of guilty, the transcript of his probation revocation hearing and the findings and conclusions of the motion court. These findings of fact and conclusions of law are fully supported by the record and are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the allegations in his motion, the transcript of his plea of guilty, the transcript of his probation revocation hearing and the findings and conclusions of the motion court. These findings of fact and conclusions of law are fully supported by the record and are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Judgment affirmed.

Freeman v. State, 817 S.W.2d 553, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1246, 1991 WL 153006 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

817 S.W.2d 553 (Freeman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.