Freeman v. Charvis
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
MARK ELLIOTT FREEMAN, Plaintiff,
v. Civil Action No. 11-1046 (JEB)
HUGO CHARVIS, et al., Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On or around June 6, 2011, Plaintiff Mark Freeman filed an incomprehensible Complaint naming scores of Defendants and mentioning everything from his New Jersey high school records to his decision to decline matching funds when running for President of the United States to a settlement conference in the Virgin Islands. Defendant Brit Bryant filed a Motion to Dismiss on July 14, 2011, and the Court that same day directed Plaintiff to respond by August 18, 2011, or face the risk that the case would be dismissed. Plaintiff has yet to respond to Bryant’s Motion.
Although Defendant raises many compelling arguments as to the deficiency of Plaintiff’s Complaint, the Court need not address them. Instead, the Court will, by separate Order this day, find that Plaintiff has conceded the Motion under LCvR 7(b), thereby resulting in dismissal.
/s/ James E. Boasberg
JAMES E. BOASBERG
United States District Judge Date: August 25, 2011
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Freeman v. Charvis (Freeman v. Charvis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.