Freeman v. Charvis
This text of Freeman v. Charvis (Freeman v. Charvis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
MARK ELLIOTT FREEMAN,
Plaintiff,
v. Civil Action No. 11-1046 (JEB)
HUGO CHARVIS, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On or around June 6, 2011, Plaintiff Mark Freeman filed an incomprehensible Complaint
naming scores of Defendants and mentioning everything from his New Jersey high school
records to his decision to decline matching funds when running for President of the United States
to a settlement conference in the Virgin Islands. Defendant Brit Bryant filed a Motion to
Dismiss on July 14, 2011, and the Court that same day directed Plaintiff to respond by August
18, 2011, or face the risk that the case would be dismissed. Plaintiff has yet to respond to
Bryant’s Motion.
Although Defendant raises many compelling arguments as to the deficiency of Plaintiff’s
Complaint, the Court need not address them. Instead, the Court will, by separate Order this day,
find that Plaintiff has conceded the Motion under LCvR 7(b), thereby resulting in dismissal.
/s/ James E. Boasberg JAMES E. BOASBERG United States District Judge Date: August 25, 2011
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Freeman v. Charvis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freeman-v-charvis-dcd-2011.