Freedus v. Blanchfield & Howard, Inc.

116 A.D.2d 968, 498 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51736
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Freedus v. Blanchfield & Howard, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 115 A.D.2d 819

Opinion

— Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. No issue of fact was considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, this court certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: "Did this court err, as a matter of law, in modifying the order and judgment by reversing so much thereof as fixed the amount of counsel fees, remitting the matter to Special Term for further proceedings and, as so modified, affirming the order?” Mahoney, P. J., Main, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freedus v. Blanchfield & Howard, Inc., 116 A.D.2d 968, 498 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51736 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

116 A.D.2d 968 (Freedus v. Blanchfield & Howard, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.