Freedus v. Blanchfield & Howard, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Freedus v. Blanchfield & Howard, Inc.

115 A.D.2d 819, 496 N.Y.S.2d 380, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55212

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 5, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 115 A.D.2d 819 (Freedus v. Blanchfield & Howard, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Freedus v. Blanchfield & Howard, Inc., 115 A.D.2d 819, 496 N.Y.S.2d 380, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55212 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinions

Appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Williams, J.), entered January 14, 1985 in Albany County, which resettled a prior order of said court granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and (2) from the judgment entered thereon.

For the reasons stated in the decision written at Special Term, we conclude that plaintiff is entitled to partial summary judgment in its action for counsel fees. However, since defendant contested the reasonableness of the amount of the counsel fees, a hearing should be held on that issue (see, Equitable Lbr. Corp. v IPA Land Dev. Corp., 38 NY2d 516, 524).

Order and judgment modified, on the law, without costs, by reversing so much thereof as fixed the amount of counsel fees; matter remitted to Special Term for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith; and, as so modified, affirmed. Main, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Williams, J.), entered January 14, 1985 in Albany County, which resettled a prior order of said court granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and (2) from the judgment entered thereon.

For the reasons stated in the decision written at Special Term, we conclude that plaintiff is entitled to partial summary judgment in its action for counsel fees. However, since defendant contested the reasonableness of the amount of the counsel fees, a hearing should be held on that issue (see, Equitable Lbr. Corp. v IPA Land Dev. Corp., 38 NY2d 516, 524).

Order and judgment modified, on the law, without costs, by reversing so much thereof as fixed the amount of counsel fees; matter remitted to Special Term for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith; and, as so modified, affirmed. Main, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 A.D.2d 819, 496 N.Y.S.2d 380, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freedus-v-blanchfield-howard-inc-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack