Freedman v. First National Bank of Hollywood

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Freedman v. First National Bank of Hollywood

255 So. 2d 709

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 23, 1971

DocketNo. P-264

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 255 So. 2d 709 (Freedman v. First National Bank of Hollywood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Freedman v. First National Bank of Hollywood, 255 So. 2d 709 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case is before the court on appel-lee’s motion to quash or dismiss the appeal on the ground that it is frivolous and taken only for the purpose of delay.

The motion of appellee is denied, oral argument dispensed with, and the appeal is considered on its merits. Our review of the brief filed by appellant convinces us that the only substantial points presented for decision raise issues of law which have heretofore been resolved against appellant by this court’s decision on the question certified to it in this case by the Circuit Court of the Fourth Judicial Circuit.¹ The remaining points urged by appellant are without substantial merit and do not warrant reversal of the challenged judgment.

Affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case is before the court on appel-lee’s motion to quash or dismiss the appeal on the ground that it is frivolous and taken only for the purpose of delay.

The motion of appellee is denied, oral argument dispensed with, and the appeal is considered on its merits. Our review of the brief filed by appellant convinces us that the only substantial points presented for decision raise issues of law which have heretofore been resolved against appellant by this court’s decision on the question certified to it in this case by the Circuit Court of the Fourth Judicial Circuit.¹ The remaining points urged by appellant are without substantial merit and do not warrant reversal of the challenged judgment.

Affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 So. 2d 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/freedman-v-first-national-bank-of-hollywood-fladistctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack