Freedman & Slater, Inc. v. United States
34 Cust. Ct. 314
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Freedman & Slater, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 32 Cust. Ct. 325 →
United States Customs Court·Decided March 24, 1955·No. No. 58861; protests 171111-K, etc. (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waste sheepskin scrap similar in all material respects to that the subject of Fairfield Wool Co., Inc. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 199, C. D. 1653), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Freedman & Slater, Inc. v. United States, 34 Cust. Ct. 314 (cusc 1955).
34 Cust. Ct. 314 (Freedman & Slater, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fairfield Wool Co. v. United States
33 Cust. Ct. 199 (U.S. Customs Court, 1954)