Freedman & Slater, Inc. v. United States

30 Cust. Ct. 476, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 419

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Freedman & Slater, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 31 Cust. Ct. 314 →

United States Customs Court·Decided June 10, 1953·No. No. 57389; protest 194632-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the items in question are ashtrays and properly dutiable as Such under the provision for “smokers’ articles” in paragraph 1552, supra, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freedman & Slater, Inc. v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 476, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 419 (cusc 1953).

Pincite

30 Cust. Ct. 476 (Freedman & Slater, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.