Fredis Mauricio Flores v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-15-00487-CR Style: Fredis Mauricio Flores v. The State of Texas Date motion filed*: August 24, 2015 Type of motion: Motion to Substitute Counsel on Appeal Party filing motion: Appellant’s new counsel Allen C. Isbell Document to be filed: N/A
Is appeal accelerated? No.
Ordered that motion is:
Granted Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ The motion to substitute counsel is granted, but construed as a notice of appearance as lead counsel, and the Clerk of this Court is directed to note Allen C. Isbell as lead counsel for appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.1(a), 6.2, 6.5(d). If counsel J. Celeste Carter Blackburn requests withdrawal, she must file a motion that complies with Rule 6.5(d).
Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes A
Date: August 27, 2015
November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fredis Mauricio Flores v. State (Fredis Mauricio Flores v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.