Fredis Mauricio Flores v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 27, 2015·No. 01-15-00487-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-15-00487-CR Style: Fredis Mauricio Flores v. The State of Texas Date motion filed*: August 24, 2015 Type of motion: Motion to Substitute Counsel on Appeal Party filing motion: Appellant’s new counsel Allen C. Isbell Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? No.

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ The motion to substitute counsel is granted, but construed as a notice of appearance as lead counsel, and the Clerk of this Court is directed to note Allen C. Isbell as lead counsel for appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.1(a), 6.2, 6.5(d). If counsel J. Celeste Carter Blackburn requests withdrawal, she must file a motion that complies with Rule 6.5(d).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes  A

Date: August 27, 2015

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fredis Mauricio Flores v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Fredis Mauricio Flores v. State (Fredis Mauricio Flores v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.