Fredis Mauricio Flores v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 10, 2015·No. 01-15-00487-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-15-00487-CR Style: Fredis Mauricio Flores v. The State of Texas Date motion filed*: August 28, 2015 Type of motions: Motion to Withdraw as Counsel Parties filing motions: Appellant’s Appointed Counsel Janet Celeste Carter-Blackburn Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? No.

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Appellant’s appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel is granted because it complies with Rule 6.5(d) and this Court already granted new counsel Allen C. Isbell’s motion to substitute on August 27, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(b), (d). Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is directed to remove Janet Celeste Carter-Blackburn as attorney for appellant.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting individually

Date: September 10, 2015

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fredis Mauricio Flores v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Fredis Mauricio Flores v. State (Fredis Mauricio Flores v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.