Fredericks v. Hammons

264 P. 692, 33 Ariz. 324, 1928 Ariz. LEXIS 202
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fredericks v. Hammons. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 Ariz. 310
Arizona Supreme Court·Decided February 28, 1928·No. Civil No. 2678.·Published

Opinion

This suit was brought to enforce the double liability of stockholder Fredericks in the Commercial Trust Savings Bank, an insolvent banking corporation.

The controlling facts are identical with the facts in Herndon v. Hammons, ante, p. 88, 262 P. 620, and Hammons v.Watkins, ante, p. 76, 262 P. 616, and the decisions in those cases are decisive of this one.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to dismiss the complaint. *Page 325

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fredericks v. Hammons, 264 P. 692, 33 Ariz. 324, 1928 Ariz. LEXIS 202 (Ark. 1928).

264 P. 692 (Fredericks v. Hammons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Herndon v. Hammons
262 P. 620 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1927)
Hammons v. Watkins
262 P. 616 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1927)