Fredericks v. Hammons

Arizona Supreme Court

Fredericks v. Hammons

264 P. 692, 33 Ariz. 324, 1928 Ariz. LEXIS 202

CourtArizona Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 28, 1928

DocketCivil No. 2678.

StatusPublished

This text of 264 P. 692 (Fredericks v. Hammons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fredericks v. Hammons, 264 P. 692, 33 Ariz. 324, 1928 Ariz. LEXIS 202 (Ark. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

This suit was brought to enforce the double liability of stockholder Fredericks in the Commercial Trust Savings Bank, an insolvent banking corporation.

The controlling facts are identical with the facts in Herndon v. Hammons, ante, p. 88, 262 P. 620, and Hammons v.Watkins, ante, p. 76, 262 P. 616, and the decisions in those cases are decisive of this one.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to dismiss the complaint. *Page 325

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This suit was brought to enforce the double liability of stockholder Fredericks in the Commercial Trust Savings Bank, an insolvent banking corporation.

The controlling facts are identical with the facts in Herndon v. Hammons, ante, p. 88, 262 P. 620, and Hammons v.Watkins, ante, p. 76, 262 P. 616, and the decisions in those cases are decisive of this one.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to dismiss the complaint. *Page 325

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 P. 692, 33 Ariz. 324, 1928 Ariz. LEXIS 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fredericks-v-hammons-ariz-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack