Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Frederick v. State

Frederick v. State

155 So. 3d 1253, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1048, 2015 WL 341716
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Frederick v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11665 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 28, 2015·No. No. 4D14-3223·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Defendant’s claim that his consecutive minimum mandatory sentences are illegal because they arose from the same criminal episode is rejected for the reasons stated in Williams v. State, 125 So.3d 879 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (en banc).

CIKLIN, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frederick v. State, 155 So. 3d 1253, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1048, 2015 WL 341716 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

155 So. 3d 1253 (Frederick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
125 So. 3d 879 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)