Frederick v. State

135 So. 3d 471, 2014 WL 1099332, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4168
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 21, 2014
DocketNo. 5D12-1125
StatusPublished

This text of 135 So. 3d 471 (Frederick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frederick v. State, 135 So. 3d 471, 2014 WL 1099332, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4168 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Nicholas Frederick appeals the judgment and sentence entered against him after a jury found him guilty of numerous charges.1 Because the aggravated assault convictions on Counts V and VI involved the same victims as in Counts II and III and each offense occurred within the same criminal episode, we vacate the convictions on Counts V and VI based on double jeopardy principles. Fleming v. State, 75 So.3d 397, 400 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). In all other respects, we affirm.

[472]*472AFFIRMED, in part; VACATED, in part.

PALMER, EVANDER and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fleming v. State
75 So. 3d 397 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 So. 3d 471, 2014 WL 1099332, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frederick-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.