Frederick Charles Dutton Jr. v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Frederick Charles Dutton Jr. v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 7, 2014

Docket14-3099

StatusPublished

This text of Frederick Charles Dutton Jr. v. State of Florida (Frederick Charles Dutton Jr. v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frederick Charles Dutton Jr. v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

FREDERICK CHARLES NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO DUTTON, JR., FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Petitioner, CASE NO. 1D14-3099 v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed October 6, 2014.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Frederick Charles Dutton, Jr., pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n,

807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

THOMAS, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI