Frederick Antwan Gilyard v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 19, 2024
DocketA24A1769
StatusPublished

This text of Frederick Antwan Gilyard v. State (Frederick Antwan Gilyard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frederick Antwan Gilyard v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ July 19, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24A1769. FREDERICK ANTWAN GILYARD v. THE STATE.

In October 2023, Frederick Antwan Gilyard was indicted for aggravated assault, false imprisonment, and battery. In February and April 2024, Gilyard filed pro se general demurrers and a motion to dismiss the indictment. After a hearing, the trial court denied all the motions. Gilyard then filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction. Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1), direct appeals generally may be taken from “[a]ll final judgments, that is to say, where the case is no longer pending in the court below[.]” A criminal case is not final and ripe for appeal until all of the charges against the defendant have been resolved. See Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680, 680-681 (571 SE2d 806) (2002) (holding that a criminal case remains pending until the court enters a written judgment of conviction and sentence on each count). Gilyard’s case remains pending as it has yet to go to trial, and thus, Gilyard was required to follow the interlocutory appeal procedures outlined in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). Gilyard’s failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Ivey v. State, 210 Ga. App. 782, 783 (437 SE2d 810) (1993) (appeal of order overruling demurrer required compliance with interlocutory appeal procedure); Stewart v. State, 240 Ga. App. 154, 154 (522 SE2d 743) (1999) (order denying a motion to dismiss an indictment is an interlocutory order). For this reason, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 07/19/2024 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keller v. State
571 S.E.2d 806 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2002)
Ivey v. State
437 S.E.2d 810 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)
Stewart v. State
522 S.E.2d 743 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Frederick Antwan Gilyard v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frederick-antwan-gilyard-v-state-gactapp-2024.