Freddie Joe Simmons v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, a Corporation

611 F.2d 342, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 9727
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided December 13, 1979·No. 78-1562·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was employed by the defendant. He brought an action on a variety of theories, claiming that the defendant monitored and disclosed the contents of conversations appellant engaged in while working as a testboardman, a receiver of customer trouble reports. The trial court granted summary judgment against plaintiff on all issues. The facts and the trial court’s reasons for its disposition are thoroughly set forth in the trial court’s opinion reported at 452 F.Supp. 392 (W.D.Okl.1978).

We affirm for the reasons given by the trial court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freddie Joe Simmons v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, a Corporation, 611 F.2d 342, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 9727 (10th Cir. 1979).

611 F.2d 342 (Freddie Joe Simmons v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, a Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rassoull v. Maximus, Inc.
93 F. App'x 495 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)
Abbott v. Village of Winthrop Harbor
953 F. Supp. 931 (N.D. Illinois, 1996)
Ali v. Douglas Cable Communications
929 F. Supp. 1362 (D. Kansas, 1996)
Griggs-Ryan v. Connelly
727 F. Supp. 683 (D. Maine, 1989)
Carmie Watkins v. L.M. Berry & Company
704 F.2d 577 (Eleventh Circuit, 1983)
Goodall's Charter Bus Service, Inc. v. San Diego Unified School District
125 Cal. App. 3d 194 (California Court of Appeal, 1981)
Jandak v. Village of Brookfield
520 F. Supp. 815 (N.D. Illinois, 1981)