Fredburn Construction Corp. v. City of New York

21 N.E.2d 370, 280 N.Y. 402, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 1332
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 23, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 21 N.E.2d 370 (Fredburn Construction Corp. v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fredburn Construction Corp. v. City of New York, 21 N.E.2d 370, 280 N.Y. 402, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 1332 (N.Y. 1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are of the opinion that upon the motion made by defendant for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, a substantial question of fact was presented which entitled the plaintiff to a trial of the issue as to whether the so-called last payment voucher was intended and understood to be a last payment voucher and whether plaintiff was barred by accepting the so-called last payment from recovering any further payments from the defendant.

The judgments should be reversed and the motion denied, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Lehman, Httbbs, Loughban, Finch and Rippey, JJ., concur; O’Bbien, J., dissents; Cbane, Ch. J., taking no part.

Judgments reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ferran Concrete Co. v. Facilities Development Corp.
61 A.D.2d 1061 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Buffalo Electric Co. v. State
201 N.E.2d 869 (New York Court of Appeals, 1964)
Brandt Corp. v. City of New York
199 N.E.2d 493 (New York Court of Appeals, 1964)
Buffalo Electric Co. v. State
9 A.D.2d 372 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Pearlman v. State
18 Misc. 2d 494 (New York State Court of Claims, 1959)
Tuttle v. W. T. Grant Co.
5 A.D.2d 370 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
D'Angelo v. State
7 Misc. 2d 783 (New York State Court of Claims, 1957)
Tuttle v. W. T. Grant Co.
16 Misc. 2d 222 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
Buffalo Electric Co. v. State
4 Misc. 2d 172 (New York State Court of Claims, 1956)
Nicholas Di Menna & Sons, Inc. v. City of New York
92 N.E.2d 918 (New York Court of Appeals, 1950)
Podzuweit v. State
192 Misc. 528 (New York State Court of Claims, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 N.E.2d 370, 280 N.Y. 402, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 1332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fredburn-construction-corp-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1939.