Fred Singer Direct Marketing, Inc. v. Media Resource Group, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fred Singer Direct Marketing, Inc. v. Media Resource Group, Inc.

281 A.D.2d 513, 721 N.Y.S.2d 832, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2561

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 19, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 281 A.D.2d 513 (Fred Singer Direct Marketing, Inc. v. Media Resource Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fred Singer Direct Marketing, Inc. v. Media Resource Group, Inc., 281 A.D.2d 513, 721 N.Y.S.2d 832, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2561 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Scarpino, J.), entered March 31, 2000, as denied those branches of its motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the first, third, and fourth counterclaims asserted by the defendant Thomas V. Marianacci.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The appellant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. However, the Supreme Court properly found that the respondent raised triable issues of fact as to whether he was entitled to commissions for orders placed immediately before he left the plaintiffs employ, and to an attorney’s fee and liquidated damages pursuant to Labor Law § 198 (1-a) (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557; Gottlieb v Laub & Co., 82 NY2d 457; Taylor v Blaylock & Partners, 240 AD2d 289). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Scarpino, J.), entered March 31, 2000, as denied those branches of its motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the first, third, and fourth counterclaims asserted by the defendant Thomas V. Marianacci.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The appellant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. However, the Supreme Court properly found that the respondent raised triable issues of fact as to whether he was entitled to commissions for orders placed immediately before he left the plaintiffs employ, and to an attorney’s fee and liquidated damages pursuant to Labor Law § 198 (1-a) (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557; Gottlieb v Laub & Co., 82 NY2d 457; Taylor v Blaylock & Partners, 240 AD2d 289). O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D.2d 513, 721 N.Y.S.2d 832, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fred-singer-direct-marketing-inc-v-media-resource-group-inc-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack