Fred Haywood v. C v. Rivera

674 F. App'x 596
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided January 30, 2017·No. 16-2615·Unpublished

Opinion

*597 PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Fred Haywood appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Upon careful de novo review, see Flowers v. Anderson, 661 F.3d 977, 980 (8th Cir. 2011), we conclude the action was properly dismissed for the reasons stated in the district court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable J. Thomas Ray, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fred Haywood v. C v. Rivera, 674 F. App'x 596 (8th Cir. 2017).

674 F. App'x 596 (Fred Haywood v. C v. Rivera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Flowers v. Anderson
661 F.3d 977 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)