Fred Douglas Sutherland v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 30, 2003·No. 02-02-00341-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH

NO. 2-02-341-CV

FRED DOUGLAS SUTHERLAND                                                 APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                             APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 90
TH DISTRICT COURT OF YOUNG COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION(1) AND JUDGMENT
----------

On December 13, 2002, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

                                                                                        PER CURIAM

PANEL D: CAYCE, C.J.; DAY and LIVINGSTON, JJ.

[DELIVERED JANUARY 30, 2003]


1. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fred Douglas Sutherland v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Fred Douglas Sutherland v. State (Fred Douglas Sutherland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.