Fred Douglas Sutherland v. State
This text of Fred Douglas Sutherland v. State (Fred Douglas Sutherland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
FRED DOUGLAS SUTHERLAND APPELLANT
THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE
On December 13, 2002, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received any response.
Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).
PER CURIAM
PANEL D: CAYCE, C.J.; DAY and LIVINGSTON, JJ.
[DELIVERED JANUARY 30, 2003]
1. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fred Douglas Sutherland v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fred-douglas-sutherland-v-state-texapp-2003.