Frazier v. State
This text of 107 S.E. 896 (Frazier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The motion for a new trial in this ease contains no special ground. There was direct evidence of the guilt of the accused, and the trial judge approved the verdict. Tndeed the statement of the defendant was practically a confession of his guilt.
(а) In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it may be inferred that a liquor called for and delivered and paid for as whisky is whisky, and therefore intoxicating liquor. Jenkins v. State, 24 Ga. App. 542 (101 S. E. 691), and cases cited.
(б) Under the present prohibition laws of this State, the accused would be guilty, under an indictment for having and possessing intoxicating liquors, if he knowingly has in his possession any quantity thereof, even a spoonful. Lacount v. State, 25 Ga. App. 767 (104 S. E. 920). See Biddy v. State, 22 Ga. App. 784 (97 S. E. 196).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
107 S.E. 896, 27 Ga. App. 261, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frazier-v-state-gactapp-1921.