Biddy v. State
97 S.E. 196, 22 Ga. App. 784, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 748
Opinion
1. The excerpt from the charge of ^he court, complained of in the special ground of the motion for a new trial, was authorized by the undisputed evidence in the case; it was a correct statement of the law and was not erroneous for any reason assigned.
2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. ¿
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Biddy v. State, 97 S.E. 196, 22 Ga. App. 784, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 748 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).
97 S.E. 196 (Biddy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robinson v. State
167 S.E.2d 677 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Bienert v. State
69 S.E.2d 300 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Beasley v. State
17 S.E.2d 205 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Herbert v. State
164 S.E. 452 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Hall v. State
133 S.E. 285 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Frazier v. State
107 S.E. 896 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Lacount v. State
104 S.E. 920 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)