Frazier v. State
957 So. 2d 31, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 5790, 2007 WL 1158210
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Frazier v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 899 So. 2d 1169 →
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See San Martin v. State, 717 So.2d 462, 470-71 (noting evidentiary rulings cannot be disturbed absent abuse of discretion); Singleton v. State, 783 So.2d 970, 976 (Fla.2001) (holding that, where counsel did not raise below as grounds for objection the issue argued on appeal, the issue was not preserved for review).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Frazier v. State, 957 So. 2d 31, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 5790, 2007 WL 1158210 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
957 So. 2d 31 (Frazier v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Singleton v. State
783 So. 2d 970 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
San Martin v. State
717 So. 2d 462 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)