Frazier v. State

871 So. 2d 1036, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6267, 2004 WL 950186
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Frazier v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 899 So. 2d 1169
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 5, 2004·No. No. 4D03-1483·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Wayne David Frazier, appeals his conviction and sentence on the charges of possession of cocaine, possession of drug paraphernalia and for failure to appear. We find the three issues raised on appeal with respect to the possession charges to be without merit and affirm those convictions.

Frazier further argues that the trial court fundamentally erred in adjudicating him guilty for his failure to appear when he was not formally charged with the offense. We agree and find it was error for the trial court to convict him on this charge. Scala v. State, 770 So.2d 732 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Repetti v. State, 741 So.2d 646 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). We reverse his conviction on this charge.

[1037]*1037AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

FARMER, C.J., GUNTHER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frazier v. State, 871 So. 2d 1036, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6267, 2004 WL 950186 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

871 So. 2d 1036 (Frazier v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Repetti v. State
741 So. 2d 646 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Scala v. State
770 So. 2d 732 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)