Frazier v. State

746 So. 2d 1193, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16697, 1999 WL 1136655
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Frazier v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 766 So. 2d 459
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 14, 1999·No. No. 99-2415·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirming the order under review otherwise, we reverse and remand for an evi-dentiary hearing as to the alleged misad-vice of counsel only. Attached to the final order denying appellant’s motion for post conviction relief is the transcript of the plea colloquy in which the appellant states she has not discussed gain time with counsel. The trial court was entitled to rely on this statement, but it does not obviate the need for an evidentiary hearing on the allegation that defense counsel advised appellant she would not spend more than three years in jail as a result of her plea. See State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 285 (Fla.1996).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

ALLEN, BENTON, and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frazier v. State, 746 So. 2d 1193, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16697, 1999 WL 1136655 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

746 So. 2d 1193 (Frazier v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carr v. State
689 So. 2d 283 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)