Frazier v. State
473 So. 2d 44, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1861, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14762
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 31, 1985·No. No. 84-1836·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Upon review of the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. However, since there appears to be some misapprehension on the subject, we wish to point out that appellant’s sentence was not under the sentencing guidelines because his crime was committed on the evening immediately prior to October 1, 1983, the effective date of the guidelines, and he did not affirmatively select to be sentenced under the guidelines. See Sheffield v. State, 468 So.2d 441 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Frazier v. State, 473 So. 2d 44, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1861, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14762 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
473 So. 2d 44 (Frazier v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Traver v. State
489 So. 2d 1248 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)