Frazier v. State

64 So. 653, 10 Ala. App. 65, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 131
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Frazier v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 Ala. App. 285
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 10, 1914·Published

Opinion

WALKER, P. J.

The indictment in this case was

for murder in the first degree. The record does not show that any attempt was made by the court to comply with the requirements of section 32 of the present jury law (Acts of Ala. Sp. Sess. 1909, pp. 305, 318) applicable to the case of a person indicted for a capital felony. The record shows that the defendant ivas arraigned, that he pleaded not guilty, and was tried, convicted, and sentenced, all on the same day. The provisions referred to are mandatory, and the failure of the record on an appeal from a judgment of conviction in such a case to show a compliance with them requires a reversal of the judgment. — Jackson v. State, 171 Ala. 38, 55 South. 118; Welch v. State, 1 Ala. App. 144, 56 South. 11.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frazier v. State, 64 So. 653, 10 Ala. App. 65, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 131 (Ala. Ct. App. 1914).

64 So. 653 (Frazier v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Welch v. State
56 So. 11 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1911)
Jackson v. State
55 So. 118 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1911)