Frazier v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Frazier v. State

73 So. 764, 15 Ala. App. 451, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 10

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 9, 1917

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 73 So. 764 (Frazier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Frazier v. State, 73 So. 764, 15 Ala. App. 451, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 10 (Ala. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

PELHAM, P. J.

(1) The charges on which the defendant was convicted as set out in the second and fourth counts of the affidavit are substantially in the language of the statute descriptive of the offense, and are sufficient. — Porter v. State, infra, 72 South. 776.

(2) The statute (Acts 1915, p. 44, § 12) under which the charges were framed is not violative of the federal or state Constitution in limiting the amount of prohibited liquors a person may possess or have in possession at one time, and the demurrers attacking the affidavit on this ground are not well taken.— Southern Exp. Co. v. Whittle, 194 Ala. 406, 69 South. 652, L. R. A. 1916C, 278.

We find no error in the record.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI