Frazier v. State

73 So. 764, 15 Ala. App. 451, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 10
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 9, 1917·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PELHAM, P. J.

(1) The charges on which the defendant was convicted as set out in the second and fourth counts of the affidavit are substantially in the language of the statute descriptive of the offense, and are sufficient. — Porter v. State, infra, 72 South. 776.

(2) The statute (Acts 1915, p. 44, § 12) under which the charges were framed is not violative of the federal or state Constitution in limiting the amount of prohibited liquors a person may possess or have in possession at one time, and the demurrers attacking the affidavit on this ground are not well taken.— Southern Exp. Co. v. Whittle, 194 Ala. 406, 69 South. 652, L. R. A. 1916C, 278.

We find no error in the record.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frazier v. State, 73 So. 764, 15 Ala. App. 451, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 10 (Ala. Ct. App. 1917).

73 So. 764 (Frazier v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mobile Light R. Co. v. Fuller
92 So. 90 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1921)