Frazier v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.
This text of 33 S.E. 996 (Frazier v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. When a plaintiff’s right to recover depended upon the establishment of a particular fact, and the only proof offered for this purpose was circumstantial evidence from which the existence of such fact might be inferred, but which did not demand a finding to that effect, a recovery by the plaintiff was not lawful, when, by the positive and uncontradicted testimony of unimpeached witnesses, which was perfectly consistent with the circumstantial evidence relied on by the plaintiff, it was affirmatively shown that no such fact existed.
2. It results from an application of the above to the evidence appearing in the record of the present case that the judgment excepted to was right.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 S.E. 996, 108 Ga. 807, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frazier-v-georgia-railroad-banking-co-ga-1899.