Frazier v. City of Amsterdam
22 A.D.2d 846, 254 N.Y.S.2d 231, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2745
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 23, 1964·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The order granting permission to file a late notice of claim (General Municipal Law, § 50-e, subd. 5) was proper under the decisions of this court. (See Matter of Osborn v. Board of Educ., 5 A D 2d 929; Galerneau v. North Colonie Cent. School Dist., 7 A D 2d 693; Matter of Daigneault v. Board of Educ., 7 A D 2d 695; and see, also, Matter of Biancoviso v. City of New York, 285 App. Div. 320 [2d Dept., 1955].) Order affirmed, with $20 costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ„ concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Frazier v. City of Amsterdam, 22 A.D.2d 846, 254 N.Y.S.2d 231, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2745 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).
22 A.D.2d 846 (Frazier v. City of Amsterdam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Telerate Systems, Inc. v. Caro
689 F. Supp. 221 (S.D. New York, 1988)