Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Frazier v. City of Amsterdam

Frazier v. City of Amsterdam

22 A.D.2d 846, 254 N.Y.S.2d 231, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2745
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 23, 1964
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 22 A.D.2d 846 (Frazier v. City of Amsterdam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frazier v. City of Amsterdam, 22 A.D.2d 846, 254 N.Y.S.2d 231, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2745 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order granting permission to file a late notice of claim (General Municipal Law, § 50-e, subd. 5) was proper under the decisions of this court. (See Matter of Osborn v. Board of Educ., 5 A D 2d 929; Galerneau v. North Colonie Cent. School Dist., 7 A D 2d 693; Matter of Daigneault v. Board of Educ., 7 A D 2d 695; and see, also, Matter of Biancoviso v. City of New York, 285 App. Div. 320 [2d Dept., 1955].) Order affirmed, with $20 costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Telerate Systems, Inc. v. Caro
689 F. Supp. 221 (S.D. New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 A.D.2d 846, 254 N.Y.S.2d 231, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frazier-v-city-of-amsterdam-nyappdiv-1964.