Frasier v. Warden of SCI-Coal Township
This text of Frasier v. Warden of SCI-Coal Township (Frasier v. Warden of SCI-Coal Township) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LEEON ANTONIO FRASIER, No. 4:22-CV-01116
Petitioner, (Chief Judge Brann) v.
WARDEN SCI COAL TOWNSHIP,
Respondent.
ORDER AND NOW, this 14th day of March 2024, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner Leeon Antonio Frasier’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED.
2. A certificate of appealability shall not issue, as Frasier has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), or that “jurists of reason would find it debatable” whether this Court’s procedural ruling is correct, Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Matthew W. Brann Matthew W. Brann Chief United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Frasier v. Warden of SCI-Coal Township, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frasier-v-warden-of-sci-coal-township-pamd-2024.